7-8 pm at The Shift
Board members present: Emily Crespo, Dan Miller, Nisha Kapadia Bhesania, Malcolm Haar. Daniel Farris, Mark Ahlheim, Tony Neuhoff, Mike Sullivan , Anthony Todd
Notetaker: Emily Crespo
Meeting convened: 7:00
Site selection, Dan Miller, Mark Ahlheim: 7:01-7:33
-Two timeline scenarios: Jan 2017 and Oct 2016 developed by Dan and Mark
-Where are the “pots of money” we need, when should they be available? That info needs to reach funding team
-Variables: zoning change, designer/architect fees
-Mark says Chicago Community Loan Trust would want to get involved at the point when we have a site selected, per a conversation at the GFFC
-Anthony says site selection could motivate owners who are on the fence
-Daniel asked for actionable data on this topic to inform Site Selection committee
-Owner loan campaign should be ready to go as soon as we have a site selected
-Dan asked if we could do more temp financing in the meantime
-Anthony wants to do teasers for owner loan campaign
-Mark offered the alternative of narrowing down the potential neighborhoods using data to entice financing and kick off the campaign
-We need to find the “sweet spot” to determine when we should begin approaching people
-Mark likens the process to securing a down payment, can offer more numbers soon
-Daniel says we need to be prepared for the many rounds of financing needed: ownership, owner funds, bank loans
-Dan says we should come up with a couple of budget scenarios
-Nisha suggested getting a budget and timeline from Sugar Beet
-The funding team should look for this data
-Mike asked what commitment we’ve made to our existing owners regarding buying back shares (which may come up as a result of site selection)
-We have not made formal commitments; it is not codified in the bylaws.
-Malcolm: we will continue to act on an individual basis as “a store with good customer service”
-Nisha says Dill Pickle is continuing to perform feasibility studies, do we need to do them?
-Dan says some lenders require them
-Mark thinks we can shorten Timeline #2 contingent on funding being in place
-”Nice work, Dan.” -Dan
Marketing expenditures, Anthony 7:34-7:53
-Face-to-face encounters are most valuable, especially when it’s not the first touch
-It’s going to be more difficult this summer, since we don’t have any news
-Anthony posits it’s time to spend some actual money on marketing
-Emily brought up selling merchandise
-Merch as advertising: window clings
-Anthony thinks it merits a separate budget proposal
-Marketing ideas: CTA stations, buses
-The advertising is not that expensive, the design fees are more worrisome
-Mike asked about the sorts of events we did last year
-Malcolm reminded us Karen is an experienced marketing executive
-Daniel asked exactly what we’re hoping for when we advertise
-Anthony wants to build brand awareness, to create repeat brand experiences
-Malcolm suggests neighborhood targeted marketing to correlate with current CM events
-Merchandise ideas:
-co-branded beers, t shirts, window clings,
-Mark suggested using our existing brochures in direct mail in a sample targeted neighborhood like Lincoln Square
-Anthony likes that it’s trackable
-Anthony has an idea of how much he wants to spend, but will create a budget
-Start small, create some trackable scenarios
-Marketing at fests:
-We’ve had a positive experience
-Big fests draw more people and create brand awareness, small fests create owners and face-to-face contact
Electing officers, Mike 7:53-8:03
-We have had minimal response to the discussion requesting nominations
-Tony said we should self identify whether we are willing to accept a position if nominated and elected
-Mike surveyed the group informally
-Dan asked for clarification on the quorum decision
-voting is majority, quorum is 75%
-Anthony asked for clarification on the roles of officers
-Malcolm had some explanations, Mike added to that (I wasn’t able to capture all the details)
-Anthony thinks we should do it live
Tony moved to adjourn the meeting.
Be the first to comment.